Get d'Clu

Get a clue & wake up! The best way to lead a nation astray of its values is to keep it ignorant of its history.

IL Becomes an Official Terrorists’ State—Gitmo North

ILLINOIS TEA PARTY PATRIOTS are taking the lead on protesting the GITMO Terrorists moving to our state. It was announced this morning that the White House has made the decision, even though as late as yesterday, Quinn’s office said that the December 22nd Public Hearing will determine if this transfer will happen. 

Here is what WE can do to bring awareness to our citizens and get our voices heard!  Do we live in a communist country where our voices mean nothing??  
Other groups in Illinois will be joining us on 12/22 – AS WILL A GROUP TO COUNTER-PROTEST US
This was sent to me anonymously last night from the Democratic underground:

Tea-Bag Counter-Protest (Gitmo Trials)
Tuesday, December 22nd 2009 1 P.M.
Sterling, IL USA

Opponents of a plan to house Guantanamo Bay detainees in Carroll County say they’ll protest the move before a public hearing to be held by an advisory panel made up of state House and Senate members.

Illinois TEA Party Patriots plan to rally outside Sterling High School’s Centennial Auditorium 1 hour before the Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability opens a mandatory hearing on the sale of Thomson Correctional Center to the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

AP 12/15/09
WASHINGTON – Taking an important step on the thorny path to closing the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the White House plans to announce Tuesday that the government will acquire an underutilized state prison in rural Illinois to be the new home for a limited number of terrorist suspects held at Guantanamo.

Administration officials as well as Illinois Sen. Richard Durbin and Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn will make an official announcement at the White House.
Officials from both the White House and Durbin’s office confirmed that President Barack Obama had directed the government to acquire Thomson Correctional Center in Thomson, Ill., a sleepy town near the Mississippi River about 150 miles from Chicago. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid pre-empting Tuesday’s announcement.

Guantanamo Bay North: Thomson, Illinois

Decision to Bring Detainees to U.S. Places International Public Relations Above American Security“I remain opposed to transferring Guantanamo detainees to Illinois, or anywhere in the U.S., while awaiting more detailed information on what’s being proposed, including potential security threats and plans for resolving detainees’ final status.  As of yet, I have seen neither.”                    
— Rep. Melissa Bean (D-IL), November 18, 2009

On Tuesday, December 15, 2009, the Obama Administration announced that it will buy the Thomson Correctional Center, a State prison in Thompson, Illinois, for the purpose of housing up to 100 detainees currently held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.  This move would be a precursor to shutting down the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, which President Obama proposed in a January 2009 executive order.  According to the executive order, Guantanamo Bay would be shut by late January 2010, though that deadline will clearly be missed.  Before detainees can be moved, however, Congress must vote to allow detainees to be housed on U.S. soil for reasons other than trial.  The House Republican Conference has compiled several reason why bringing Guantanamo Bay detainees to the U.S. is dangerous, jeopardizes justice, and is a poor use of taxpayer funds.

Jeopardizing Justice:  The Thomson prison is located in the Northern District of Illinois, meaning that any civilian prosecution of terrorist detainees held there would probably occur in Rockford or downtown Chicago.   In Illinois, terrorist detainees may well enjoy the legal rights and benefits of U.S. citizens and resident aliens under the Constitution.   According to the Congressional Research Service, “non-citizens held in the United States may be entitled to more protections under the Constitution than those detained abroad.” [emphasis mine]  If tried by civilian courts, the government would be forced to reveal all of its intelligence on detainees and how it obtained it.  Additionally, treating the terrorist attacks as a simple criminal matter rather than an act of war will hinder U.S. efforts to fight terrorism and sends the wrong signal to U.S. enemies abroad.  Costly civilian court trials for detainees moved to Illinois will also likely take years.  Additionally, at a civilian trial, prosecutors would be forced to reveal U.S. intelligence on detainees, along with the methods and sources used in acquiring it.  This will enable al Qaeda to better understand our intelligence-gathering techniques and respond accordingly.  For example, Osama bin Laden used U.S. government information revealed during the 1993 World Trade Center bombing criminal trial to update and enhance his techniques. 

Wasting Taxpayer Dollars:  The Federal Bureau of Prisons estimates that purchasing the Thomson prison would cost the federal government about $120 million up front and $65 million to $85 million annually to operate.  The state-of-the-art detention facility at Guantanamo Bay was built at a cost of over $50 million for the explicit purpose of keeping terrorists away from U.S. soil.  Members may be concerned that scrapping the Guantanamo Bay facility for a more expensive one in the U.S. is an imprudent use of taxpayer dollars during a recession.  Holding and prosecuting detainees in Illinois would also place a significant cost burden on the State and local governments, as well as pose an enormous inconvenience to residents and taxpayers.  If the Moussaoui trial is an example, Rockford or Chicago will be a scene of rooftop snipers, bomb-sniffing dogs inspecting cars, identification checks, and heavily armed patrols. 

Risking Security:  Moving almost 100 terrorist detainees to Illinois would likely increase the focus of terrorists on the State and especially Chicago metropolitan area, possibly making the region a target.  The Chicago area is home to about 9.5 million residents, the tallest building in the U.S. (Sears Tower) and the busiest airport in the nation (O’Hare International).  The people of Illinois and the Midwest should not be subjected to such a greater security threat unnecessarily. 

Thomson Correctional Center:  The Thomson Correctional Center is an eight-year-old State prison located in rural Thomson, Illinois, near the border with Iowa.  The facility is about 150 miles from Chicago.  The 1,600-bed State prison currently holds about 200 minimum security inmates.  Some Members may be concerned that the Thomson prison does not have facilities for civilian trials or military commissions, and the closest hospital for surgery or intensive care is about 10 miles away, in Iowa.

Democrats have yet to explain how closing Guantanamo Bay and moving terrorists to the U.S. will make Americans safer.  Republicans have proposed H.R. 2294, the Keep Terrorists Out of America Act, which gives Congress an opportunity to stand with the American people by affirming their opposition to releasing the terrorists at Guantanamo prison or bringing them into the U.S.  The bill makes clear that governors and State legislatures must pre-approve the transfer or release of any terrorist detainee into their respective states.  Lastly, it requires the President to meet strict criteria and certification standards before terrorists housed at the Guantanamo prison could be brought to the United States.  For more information, visit [ Staff Contact: Adam Hepburn,, x63202 ]

Please be sure to sign and forward our petition:

Please feel free to forward this article with the petition to people in Illinois.
Chuck Goudie’s article:

There’s no date yet for the garage sale at Gitmo.

Nevertheless, White House officials are about to send off a supply of wardrobe boxes so 250 radical Islamist terrorists can start packing their thobe robes for a one-way trip to Illinois.

Expect an announcement before the end of the year that part of the nearly empty Thomson, Illinois, state penitentiary will be turned into a prison camp for Guantanamo inmates. Might I recommend that the feds also buy a selection of thermal taqiyahs to keep the prisoners’ scalps from getting chilly. Northwestern Illinois isn’t as warm as eastern Cuba in the wintertime.

A draft of a memo prepared by the Justice Department identified Thomson as the number one site under consideration. The memo had been “leaked” to a political Web site; however, don’t confuse the term “leaked” with “unapproved.” Most information leaked by politicians or their top staffers is part of a grand scheme devised by operatives in a formerly smoky room.

Asked about the memo, a White House official described it as “pre-decisional,” which makes perfect sense. “Pre” means before and “decisional” means the act of making a decision. Since a decision hasn’t been made yet, pre-decisional is an apt description … especially if the White House official was pre-delusional as to what the outcome will be.
Once the place is purchased by the Federal Bureau of Prisons and Gitmo prisoners are moved to Thomson, the fun will begin.
Just like it did at Guantanamo.

Call it playing by the book.

The “Declaration of Jihad” book.

The rules of engagement for captured terrorists are prescribed as clearly as can be in lesson 18. That is the chapter titled “Prisons and Detention Centers.” Here are the first two, and presumably most important, rules for prisoners to follow:

1. At the beginning of the trial, once more the brothers must insist on proving that torture was inflicted on them by State Security (investigators) before the judge. 2. Complain (to the court) of mistreatment while in prison.

So, whether or not terrorist prisoners have been strung up by their toenails, they are to “insist on proving torture was inflicted on them” and “complain of mistreatment while in prison.”

Such tactics shouldn’t be surprising. The playbook was found by British police in May of 2000 on a computer seized during a raid of Osama bin Laden’s one-time personal secretary.

Even though the 180-page “al-Qaida handbook,” was authenticated and used by federal prosecutors, it has been criticized as incomplete and not the genuine article.

You can’t argue with this: The rules set forth in the prison section of the Jihad handbook line up with the behavior of top terrorist suspects at Gitmo.

“The brother has to do his best to know the names of the state security officers, who participated in his torture and mention their names to the judge,” states one rule for captured Jihadists. “These names may be obtained from brothers who had to deal with those officers in previous cases.”

If you don’t still don’t believe that Thomson-bound terrorists are just following orders by fabricating torture claims, consider these comments:

“al-Qaida’s training manual, seized by British authorities in Manchester, England, openly instructs detained al-Qaida fighters to claim torture and other types of abuse as a means of obtaining a moral advantage over their captors.

That advice has been routinely followed by detainees at Guantanamo Bay, who have succeeded in generating incessant demands from international actors or for the base’s closure or ‘for their own liberation,’ unquote. That’s what was in their manual.”

Those are of the words of Rep. Trent Franks, an Arizona Republican and a member of the Armed Services Committee and the Judiciary Committee, during a hearing last May on closing Guantanamo.

“Isn’t the administration’s closure of Gitmo and the removal of enemy combatants, possibly even in the United States, a complete victory of lawfare for al-Qaida?” Rep. Franks asked Attorney General Eric Holder, who was a witness at the hearing.

“I mean, what else could they (the terrorists) possibly ask for if this is in their book and we’re following it to the letter? What more could they ask for us to do?” Franks said.

Atty. Gen. Holder replied: “I don’t think it’s a victory. I think it’ll be a victory for our country and a victory for the causes that we fight for by closing Guantanamo and taking from al-Qaida the ability to recruit and point to that place as a place where inappropriate things happen, true or not. I mean, that has become a symbol of practices that this administration has decided not to use. [try not to roll your eyes…]

So I don’t see the closing of Guantanamo as a victory at all for al-Qaida. I think it’s going to be a victory for the American people and for our allies.”

Regardless, the 559 official residents of Thomson, Illinois, will soon be able to decide for themselves. As they greet the prison buses rolling down Highway 84, they should be prepared to see rule #8B in action from the Jihadist training manual.

“When the brothers are transported from and to the prison (on their way to the court) they should shout Islamic slogans out loud from inside the prison cars to impress upon the people and their family the need to support Islam.”

• Chuck Goudie, whose column appears each Monday, is the chief investigative reporter at ABC 7 News in Chicago. The views in this column are his own and not those of WLS-TV. He can be reached by e-mail at and followed at


U.S. announces transfer of Guantanamo detainees to Illinois prison

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Tuesday that a bipartisan majority in Congress “already rejected bringing terrorists to U.S. soil for long-term detention.”

“The administration,” McConnell said, “has failed to explain how transferring terrorists to Gitmo North will make Americans safer than keeping these terrorists off of our shores in the secure facility in Cuba.”

Closure Of Guantanamo Detention Facilities 

    January 22, 2009.

    Transferring terrorists to Gitmo North will not make Americans safer than keeping these terrorists off of our shores in the secure facility in Cuba. This is a national security issue, not a jobs recovery issue! Let the govt. do its duty!

    IL Becomes an Official Terrorists' State—Gitmo North:

    December 15, 2009 Posted by | Action Alert, Agenda of the Left, Citizen Patriotism, Constituional Issues, Culture, Govt Oppression, Islam, Jihad in America, Leftists Criticize Conservatives, MSM Disinterest, Politics, propaganda, Real Purpose of Govt., Wake Up, WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , | 5 Comments

    Drink Your Kool Aid Now – Terror Comes to IL

    Why are some politicians so blind?  It’s a reasonable question. 

    One would think that bringing the world’s most heinous terrorists from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba ~ an island ~ and ushering them to the heartland of the United States where the best people are (yes, I said the BEST! = those with the most uncalloused attitudes and moral values) (this IS my blog, afterall…) and housing them in a previously closed detention center in the middle of Illinois might be a bad idea.  Well, if you think that might be a bad idea…  You’d be RIGHT!!!

    The answer is obvious: the politicians, specifically Governor Quinn, aren’t thinking.  How could they?  This is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard of!  This isn’t a matter of jobs and economic recovery, it’s one of national security for God’s sake!  

    A gentleman wrote to the local State Journal-Register about a week ago of how he was a guard at Gitmo.  He was so scared that the prisoners knew his home address that he’s had sleep and physical problems ever since being scared to death for his family!  These are not simple murderers.  These are hellions with no soul that feed on fear, are patient through the decades and grow on the temerity of our politicians’ neglect.  These terrorists’ will contact or be contacted with cells in the US, get set up here, and begin organizing more terror in our towns, beginning right in Illinois.  The letter writer was right—we should ALL be scared to death and stay the hell away from these demons!  Don’t bring them here to house them in prison, and don’t put them on trial in New York!  They should go before a military commission right now and be hanged before their next meal.

         : : : : : : : Now an ACTION ALERT : : : : : : :

    Please be aware that Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) is part of the decision-making panel on this issue.

    Please call:  Durbin’s office in Springfield…(217) 492-4062;  Gov. Quinn…(217) 782-0244

    Please take the time to respond on Tribune page if possible, see below.

    FROM BEV: 

    I am heading to DC next week to lobby for a new trial for Michael Behenna, where all the evidence is presented. I will accompany Michael’s mother.  I will be in DC on December 2nd and 3rd.  Please email to me your letters addressed to Senator Durbin and I will personally deliver them to Durbin’s office before I leave DC.  Let’s let him know that we don’t want the Gitmo detainees in our state.  If Durbin and Quinn want to utilize the Thomson facility and create jobs, why not take the prisoners from California, they are turning those prisoners out into the streets of California.  Perfect place for them is the Thomson facility.  California will be safer and Illinoisans will get some jobs! 

    If Pat Quinn and Senator Durbin want to create jobs by filling up this prison, then take the prisoners from California that are being turned out into the streets of California.  The people of the state of Illinois are concerned about the repercussions that will follow from bringing these terrorists to our state.  They will be given ACLU lawyers, they will be given a jury of their peers (just think about what a jury of their peers would consist of, the biggest Mosque in this country is in Bridgeview), they will be freed and turned out into our state. Further, I do not want my tax dollars going to defend terrorists who were captured off the battlefields!!!

    We have Soldiers who are laying their lives on the line everyday to keep us all safe from these terrorists and now we are going to bring them to our state?!!  We have Heroes who have given their lives to keep us all safe and to do this is a slap in the face of every Gold Star Family and every Soldier serving! My Son served 4 deployments in this war on terror and this is a slap in his face and mine! This is a reckless and dangerous proposal and I know the people of Illinois will fight this. 

    I remind Senator Durbin and Gov Quinn they work for us and it is their DUTY to represent the people of Illinois!  If you want to make this facility productive,  bring those prisoners from California here!

    ~  Bev Perlson with Band of Mothers, Illinois


    Need Bloggers to respond to Chicago Tribune Article Today (see below):


    Thomson prison: State moving to clear decks on possible sale,
    Illinois lawmaker wants to speed up federal takeover

    By Ray Long
    Tribune reporter
    November 27, 2009

    SPRINGFIELD – — A key state lawmaker wants to fast-track hearings on the possible sale of the Thomson Correctional Center to the federal government, a move made easier when the Quinn administration filed its recommendation for closing the prison.

    The Thomson prison has emerged as a leading site for a U.S. detention center to house terrorism suspects now being held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

    Gov. Pat Quinn’s Department of Corrections filed paperwork Wednesday with a legislative oversight commission that must review all major state-facility closings, including the proposed sale of the northwestern Illinois prison, before an administration moves forward.

    “Our goal is to have this public hearing by the end of December,” said state Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, D- Evanston, who co-chairs the bipartisan review panel and said he wants to act “with all deliberate speed.”

    “I support the idea of closing the Thomson facility and negotiating a fair price with the federal government for them to acquire the facility,” Schoenberg said. “The area’s desperate for jobs and this would appear to be a responsible way to boost the local economy.”


    Although many Republicans have raised concerns that putting terrorism suspects into the prison would put Illinoisans at risk, Schoenberg dismissed the fears.

    “This is not like the ‘Field of Dreams,’ where if you build it, they will come,” Schoenberg said.

    From the House Repub. Leader:


    November 16, 2009 | House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH)

    All year long, Republicans have asked the Obama Administration this basic question: What is the Administration’s overarching strategy to confront and defeat the terrorist threat?  To date, the Obama Administration has refused to answer.

    Despite Americans’ strong opposition to importing terrorists held at the Guantanamo Bay prison into the United States, the Obama Administration continues to move forward with their dangerous plans to do so anyway.  Over the last three days, the Administration has signaled that it will not only bring 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and other 9/11 conspirators to New York City for trial in civilian federal court, rather than continuing their military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay, but it also is proposing to house Guantanamo terrorists at a prison in Illinois. [emphasis mine]

    House Republicans from Illinois strongly oppose importing these terrorists – men who have made the destruction of America their central focus – into their state.  Politico  reports on their efforts to block this move and stand up for the American people:

    “Illinois Republicans continued their barrage Monday against moving Guantanamo detainees to their state, unveiling legislation that seeks to slow President Barack Obama’s movement to ship terrorist suspects onto U.S. soil.”

    “[Rep. Mark] Kirk – along with Illinois Republican Reps. Peter Roskam, Judy Biggert and Don Mazzulo, Tim Johnson, John Shimkus and Aaron Schock – expressed concern about ‘increased attention from the Jihadist world’ that would be paid to Chicago, including the potential that terrorists would be traveling through O’Hare International Airport en route to visiting the detainees.’”

    How will trying these terrorists in civilian court, rather than military tribunals, ensure that justice is done for the families of 9/11 victims?  Homeland Security Committee Ranking Republican Peter King (R-NY) explained in a New York Post  op-ed why this decision puts the interest of liberal, special-interest groups ahead of safety and security of the American people:

    “While it may be hailed by Europeans, the ACLU and the far-left-wing of the Democratic Party, the president’s action actually threatens American lives and weakens US national security.”

    “By transferring KSM and four of his fellow conspirators from the impenetrable detention facility at Guantanamo Bay to lower Manhattan, the president creates an enormous, unnecessary terror risk to the people who already live and work downtown.”

    The American people are firmly opposed to importing terrorists.  According to a Gallup survey released this summer, “By more than 3-1, [those surveyed] oppose moving some of the accused terrorists housed there to prisons in their own states.” A survey from Rasmussen confirmed this report.

    In short, both the Gallup and Rasmussen surveys show that 75 percent of Americans want to keep terrorists out of America.  That’s why House Republicans have introduced the Keep Terrorists Out of America Act  (H.R. 2294), legislation aimed at stopping the importation of terrorists held at the Guantanamo Bay prison by:

    •    Affirming Congress’ opposition to transferring or releasing terrorists held at the Guantanamo Bay prison into the United States.  

    •    Prohibiting the Administration from transferring or releasing any terrorist detainees at Guantanamo Bay to any state without express approval from the state’s governor and legislature, and certification to Congress that strict requirements have been met.  

    •    Prohibiting the President from transferring or releasing a terrorist detainee into the United States without fulfilling strict congressional notification and certification requirements.

    Where do House Democrats stand on this issue, and will they join with most of the American people and oppose importing these dangerous terrorists?  Will they schedule a vote on the Keep Terrorists Out of America Act ?  The decisions by the White House are further evidence it is reverting to a dangerous pre-9/11 mentality – treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue and hoping for the best.  What America deserves, instead, is a real strategy for fighting and winning the war on America’s terrorist enemies that includes an effective, credible, and consistent plan for all terrorist detainees

    H-204, THE CAPITOL
    (202) 225-4000 | GOPLEADER.GOV


  • Gov. Quinn, Sen. Durbin to discuss Thomson Correctional Center’s future (Chicago Tribune)
  • Administration report favorable on takeover of Thomson Correctional Center (Chicago Tribune)
  • White House: Obama administration eyes near-empty Illinois prison to house Guantanamo inmates (Chicago Tribune)

    Drink Your Kool Aid Now-Terror Comes to IL:

    November 30, 2009 Posted by | Action Alert, Citizen Patriotism, Constituional Issues, Islam, Jihad in America, Politics, Real Purpose of Govt., Wake Up, WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

    Poll: What Do You Think About Bringing the Gitmo Terrorists to Illinois?


    Poll: What Do You Think About Bringing the Gitmo Terrorists
    to Illinois?:

    November 23, 2009 Posted by | Action Alert, Citizen Patriotism, Family, Islam, Jihad in America, Politics, Real Purpose of Govt., Wake Up, WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

    Terrorism Against Ourselves

    We are our own worst enemy. The Obama Adminstration, specifically the Dept. of Homeland Security and Janet Napolitano, has the most bass-akwards priorities I have ever seen a such a high-ranking important figure portray openly.

    Homeland chief warns against anti-Muslim backlash (AP) – Nov 8, 2009

    ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.

    Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday’s rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  (link

    Yeah, the anti-TERRORIST jihadi shooters sure don’t deserve any backlash from Americans, oh no!  If there were any backlash like that, it might start by PROFILING Muslim-looking men and be motivated by Hate and Anger at the destruction of HUMAN LIVES…  And we wouldn’t want that, now would we?  Why is this woman so incredibly upside-down, inside-out and backward in her thinking?  I’m verklempft by this entire discussion!

    Fort Hood killer ‘does not represent Muslims’: American security chief

    Daniel Bardsley

    Last Updated: November 09. 2009 12:32AM UAE / November 8. 2009 8:32PM GMT


    Janet Napolitano, the US secretary of homeland security,
    visits Zayed University. Delores Johnson / The National

    ABU DHABI // The killing of 13 people by a Muslim psychiatrist at an American army base must not lead to the victimisation of Muslim Americans, the US secretary of homeland security has said.   [Of course not, nor should any one crime lead to another.  ~getdclu]


    “We object to, and do not believe, that anti-Muslim sentiment should emanate from this,” she said. “This was an individual who does not represent the Muslim faith.”

    Describing the killings as “a terrible tragedy”, Ms Napolitano said a civil rights and civil liberties directorate in her department aimed to “prevent everybody being painted with a broad brush”.

    “That work is ongoing and is part and parcel of how we view security,” she said. “One of the things we’ll do is make sure that we’re reaching out to the state and local authorities within the US, because they often have better outreach to members of the Muslim community than we do.” Ms Napolitano was speaking to female students at Zayed University, and took part in a private question-and-answer session with them…

    I think Mrs. N. should concentrate on getting other AMERICANS’ opinions of what’s going on in this country and how she’s handling OUR SECURITY here!!!  This editor ‘don’t tink she do a gud enuf yob da’. 

    My friend over at Target Rich Environment calls this waco turn from seemingly mild-mannered Muslim shrink to frothing-mouthed shooting jihadist, “sudden jihad syndrome”.  I like that.  Here are a few more (add your own to the comment track!):  advanced encephalitis, post reduction syndrome,  to kill a mocking-rationalist, debate-a-lib disease, etc.

    Stay home ma’am, save us the tax dollars and fuel costs, and worry about “training and sharing best practices” here before skipping off to the UAE to talk about visas and the over 200k GOVERNMENT JOBS YOU’RE WORRIED ABOUT!!!

    WE are your priority because YOU WORK FOR US!  Get it through that thick liberal denseness you call an ideology and understand that you are suffocating any chance you have for keeping ANY seats you gained in 2008.  2010 will be a reckoning; 2012 will be your bloodbath!

    Share your thoughts.

    #Terrorism Against Ourselves: 

    November 23, 2009 Posted by | Agenda of the Left, Islam, Jihad in America, Political Correctness, propaganda, Real Purpose of Govt., WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , | 3 Comments

    “Full Protections of the US Legal System”

    What the heck is going on here?  It’s as though I’m unable to awaken from the worst nightmare —in which the most vile creatures, criminals of the basest sort, have been elevated by dear leader to the level of US Citizen, with all the rights thereof.  THESE ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS!!!  The unabashed temerity with which this administration flaunts its power is disgusting, and this act in particular is sacrilegious and an affront on decency.

    WE the PEOPLE are being TERRORIZED!

    The ancient Romans had different levels of society.  Paul (formerly Saul of Tarsus) of the Bible talks of his uniqueness in being a Roman citizen and therefore he must be tried dutifully and cannot be crucified like ordinary peasants.  The ancient levels of Patrician and Plebian have no place in American society; however Mr. Obama has deigned to reinstate  the idea of social nobility and elite citizen families by the ignorance of bowing to royalty—concepts the Founders were determined would have no place in the new United States.  For 230 years, each president has never bowed to recognize nobility, but merely shown respect with a handshake.  The important traditions of two and a quarter centuries are now for naught because the overgrown-new-kid-on-the-block (“ONKOB”)has chosen to toss them aside like yesterday’s used gum.  Gee, thanks.  We didn’t need those protocol people anyway, did we.

    Just because a person is IN our country does not mean they receive the
    rights, provisions or protections OF our country!

    Who was the original liberal dingaling who spawned THAT idea, anyway?  He needs to be drawn and quartered.

    The TERRORISTS —- that is, those hairy fellows who came into this country, stayed illegally, planned horrendous things and actually DID them to OVER 3,000 people in three different locations simultaneously (proving the planning part), who created great fear and trepidation (providing the terror part), who in turn created such huge pain for our country that, once the initial shock was over, brought our country closer together and focused us into solidarity against these jihadi killers!  Whatever happened to that, Mr. President?  All you are doing now is opening the original wounds, disgracing and demoralizing New Yorkers, and parading these SCUM around like they have ANYTHING worth showing off.  Bush was right to have them sentenced to death in military court, but Eric Holder put blockade after blockade in place to stop that, didn’t he?!!  Now you have your prize – and we have you.  Oh joy.

    View this video and then write the Obamanation and your non-representing Representatives. (hat tip Atlas Shrugs)

    But, you say, we are “not at war.”  Oh yes we are.  The Jihad war has begun in earnest, and along with the many thousands of terrorist attacks by Muslims recorded just since 9/11/2001, the other instruments, even more effective than those acts of terrorism, of Jihad include deployment of the Money Weapon (and the propaganda it can buy), campaigns of Da’wa, and demographic conquest.

    In case you didn’t know, this is the terrible law this scum lives by and requires the rest of the world to uphold:


    Understanding Shariah law is integral to understanding the dangers of Shariah-compliant finance. Shariah law is Islamic law dating back to the 7th century and is today the law of the land in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan and the law under which the Taliban operates.

    Shariah law authorities, some of whom are now being paid handsomely by Barclays, Dow Jones, Standard & Poors, HSBC, Citibank, Merrill Lynch, Deutschebank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Credit Suisse and others have the power to dictate Shariah compliance as deemed by “scholarly consensus” on matters of finance, family, penal law, apostasy, and war.

    Examples of authoritarian Shariah law include: requirement of women to obtain permission from husbands for daily freedoms; beating of disobedient woman and girls; execution of homosexuals; engagement of polygamy and forced child marriages; the testimony of four male witnesses to prove rape; honor killings of those, principally women, who have dishonored the family; death to apostate Muslims who chose to leave Islam; inferior status of non-Muslims, and capital punishment for those who “slander Islam.”

    Obama’s home boys and propaganda machine (NBC) and recipient of Obama bucks is going Islam. Big time. Your stimulus taxpayer dollars at work.

    Shariah Finance Watch writes, “GE’s involvement with promoting Shariah, the barbaric doctrine of the enemies that seek to replace capitalism, end free speech, eliminate rights for women and phase out self-determination, should come as no surprise given their shameful business partnership with the Jihadist regime in Iran, which ended only after media and shareholder scrutiny just resulted in too much heat for GE’s management.”

    GE Capital plans $1 billion Islamic bond: report  (hat tip TC)

    DUBAI (Zawya Dow Jones) — General Electric Capital Corp. plans to sell up to $1 billion of Islamic bonds, or sukuk, as early as next week, a banker aware of the deal said Sunday.


    Citigroup and Goldman Sachs were mandated as lead arrangers of the bond, he said.


    “Full Protections of the US Legal System”:

    November 20, 2009 Posted by | Action Alert, Christian, Citizen Patriotism, Constituional Issues, Govt Oppression, Islam, Jihad in America, Life with Big Brother, Politics, Real Purpose of Govt., WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

    Miss Bush Yet?!

    As I was scanning my tweeps on Twitter (that’s social media for you other twits…) (I’ve always wanted to say that – ha!) I came across a re-tweeted post from stephenkruiser about this great article in the UK Telegraph, and indeed it is a good one.  I’m posting the entire article for your reading pleasure.  Please be so kind to address whether you think BO has enough “fire in his belly” or if he should be “a bit more like Mr. Bush.” 

    Bloodless President Barack Obama makes Americans wistful for George W Bush

    Barack Obama’s reaction to bad news is to play it so cool that Americans yearn for a bit more drama – and some even for his predecessor, writes Toby Harnden in Washington.

    Toby Harnden’s American Way
    Published: 5:57PM GMT 07 Nov 2

    During the election campaign, Barack Obama‘s cool detachment was a winning quality, the “No Drama Obama” a welcome contrast with the “Mr Angry” John McCain, never mind the hot-headed “I’m the decider” President George W Bush.

    A year into his presidency, however, Mr Obama seems a curiously bloodless president. If he experiences passion, he seldom shows it. It is often anyone’s guess as to whether an event or issue truly moves him.

    He has spent more than two months considering a troop increase but do we know how he really feels about the Afghan war?

    In a sign that the Obama honeymoon truly is over, I began to hear this week the first stirrings of a wistfulness about Mr Bush. “I never thought I’d hear myself say it,” one Democrat told me. “But Obama makes you feel that at least with Bush you knew where he was on something.”

    When Mr Bush’s Republicans were defeated in the 2006 mid-term elections, it was the President himself who stepped up and declared that his party had received “a thumpin'”. The Democratic defeats on Tuesday were not on anything like the same scale but Mr Obama acted as if nothing at all had happened.

    Mr Obama had campaigned for Jon Corzine, New Jersey’s Democratic governor, five times, twice just last Sunday. But when Mr Corzine lost by four points in a state Mr Obama won by 15 last year – a 19-point swing to Republicans – White House aides just shrugged.

    In Virginia, which Mr Obama won by six points last year, prompting Democrats to declare an historic political realignment in the state, the Democratic candidate went down by 17 points in the biggest landslide since 1961 – a 23-point swing to the Grand Old Party.

    It took Senator Mark Warner of Virginia to admit that his party “got walloped”. For three days, Mr Obama maintained a studied silence about the results while his aides blamed them on local factors that had nothing to do with the President. And to think that it was Mr Bush who was always accused of being “in denial”.

    More serious perhaps was Mr Obama’s strange disconnectedness over the Fort Hood massacre of 13 soldiers by an Army major and devout Muslim who opposed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, had praised suicide bombing and shouted “Allahu Akbar” as he opened fire.

    Maybe Mr Obama had been reading the American press, much of which somehow contrived to present the atrocity as a result of combat stress due to soldiers going on repeated war deployments (though Major Nadal Hasan had not been on any) and therefore, no doubt, Mr Bush’s fault.

    When the television networks cut to the President, viewers listened to him spend more than two surreal minutes talking to a gathering of Native Americans about their “extraordinary” and “extremely productive” conference, pausing to give a cheery “shout out” to a man named Dr Joe Medicine Crow. Only then did he briefly and mechanically address what had happened in Texas.

    On Friday, when most of the basic facts were available, Mr Obama tried again. It was scarcely any better. He began by offering “an update on the tragedy that took place” – as if it was an earthquake and not a terrorist attack from an enemy within – and ended with a promise for more “updates in the coming days and weeks”.

    Completely missing was the eloquence that Mr Obama employs when talking about himself. Absent too was any sense that the President empathised with the families and comrades of those murdered.

    It was a reminder that for the past 16 years Americans have had two Presidents who would often extemporise and express emotion. President Bill Clinton could certainly “feel your pain” while Mr Bush sometimes struggled to hold back tears. Mr Obama is more like President George Bush Snr, who famously communicated his concern for people by blurting out: “Message – I care.”

    The White House argues that Mr Obama was not on the ballot last week and there is therefore no need to fret. The problem with this complacency is that voters were angry about the state of the economy, which Mr Obama can’t keep blaming on his predecessor. With unemployment now above 10 per cent, Mr Obama needs to show Americans that he can relate to what they’re going through, and take responsibility.

    It could do him good to show he has a bit of fire in his belly. Perhaps he might make a decision or two based on gut instinct and deep conviction. In other words, maybe he should try being a bit more like Mr Bush.

    [Note that there are over 500 comments on this article, so you might want to continue the conversation and your comments here.  Thank you.]


    Miss Bush Yet?!: 

    November 19, 2009 Posted by | Culture, Jihad in America, Leftists Criticize Conservatives, Politics, propaganda, WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

    More Islamofascism – virulent PC virus

    Yup, the Washington cocktail crowd of P.C. Arsdom still has their collective noses in dark places while the rest of the infidel world laughs at us or is put to death in so-called “honor killings.”  Take the case of teenager Rifqa Bary (one among many!), for whom Pamela Geller has rallied for months and is blogging to try to keep her alive (recent rally in Ohio):  Rifqa Bary: Teenage Apostate in America

    The shameful decision to try the 9/11 terrorists in civil court is a travesty of justice.  The penury of prudence would be malpractice in any other field and should be barred from civilian courts.  How would these animals obtain a jury of their peers within a 50 mile range of New York City?  And if enough Muslim men could be sought, how could they be expected to abnegate their theology and ideology for the length of the trial so as not to be impartial?  Either way, justice is not served and the United States is put on trial with our military secrets out on the table for our enemies to see.  Thank you, Messrs President and Attorney General.


    The deadliest virus: Political correctness

    U.S. soldiers pay their respects in front of fallen soldier memorials for the shooting victims after the III Corps and Fort Hood Memorial Ceremony at Fort Hood, Texas.

    ‘You see, Pinocchio,” said the Blue Fairy, “a lie keeps growing and growing until it’s as plain as the nose on your face.”

    Sadly, this simple lesson, once taught only to small children, must be taught again to “grown-ups” who have conditioned our culture, our politicians and even our armed forces to deny and ignore the grave threats we face. But today the lies are called “political correctness,” and the consequences can be death.

    Far more dangerous than Maj. Nidal Hasan’s heinous act at Fort Hood is our collective refusal to see it for what it is: a terrorist act inspired by radical Islam. Radical Islam is made more dangerous because political correctness has conditioned us not to identify it as the source of terrorism.

    Like so much else delivered to us by the self-anointed virtuous class, the political correctness that would make us a “fairer” and more “open-minded” society now has us on our knees. We have so successfully shut down our body politic’s immune system that any foreign agent — in this case, radical Islam — is free, even encouraged, to run wild in our defenseless society. Even lost lives don’t slow the virulent PC virus.

    By turning Hasan into a victim, a “soldier who snapped,” terrorism’s unwitting domestic enablers denied the real danger. Sadly, the Fort Hood terror attack shows that no institution is more severely compromised by the autoimmune shutdown than the U.S. Army itself.

    Gen. George Casey, chief of staff of the Army, has mouthed the pieties of denial so convincingly and so repeatedly as to expose himself as perhaps being terminally infected. The Army’s culture is now so compromised that soldiers are conditioned to be more fearful of accusations of “Islamophobia” than of radical Islam. When the general’s first public reaction to the terrorist attack was to circle the wagons around “diversity,” can anyone blame them?

    Ironically, Hasan was fast-tracked through the Army because of his radical beliefs. Authorities knew far more about Hasan before he struck than they currently know about many of the Sept. 11 hijackers. Yet the more open he was about his extremist beliefs, the more rapidly he advanced. It usually takes 10 years to make major in the Army. Hasan made it in six. Since there is no evidence that Hasan was a military genius, what, other than his stridently public embrace of radical Islam, served to distinguish him for such rapid advancement?

    The real shock of Hasan’s terror attack was that so many seemed shocked it occurred. It was not the first domestic terrorist assault against a U.S. Army installation since Sept. 11, 2001. It was the eighth.

    What Casey’s utter oblivion makes clear is that the United States Army, at least under his command, cannot be permitted to supervise the coming investigation. Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) must not permit his call for an empowered congressional investigation to be pre-empted by any Army request to lead it.

    Transparency must not be prevented from prevailing over hollow calls for tolerance. If the Fort Hood massacre proved anything, it is that tolerating intolerance ensures the end of tolerance.

    Read more…


    A Risky Proposition for Democrats

    Will congressional Democrats support Obama’s plan for civilian trials for the 9/11 killers?
    by William Kristol
    11/13/2009 6:45:00 PM

    The Wrong Battlefield – Alan W. Dowd »

    Courts are not the place to defeat al-Qaeda. …

    November 17 2009 / Comments / Read More »

    Hasan’s Islamic Mind – by Jamie Glazov »

    An ex-Muslim demonstrates the Muslim theology that spawned Hasan’s murder spree….

    November 17 2009 / Comments / Read More »

    Resurrecting Liberation Theology – by Mark D. Tooley »

    The World Council of Churches tries to revive Marxism in religious garb. …

    November 17 2009 / Comments / Read More »

    Why Obama Nixed the Ft. Hood Probe – by Dick Morris »

    Trying to obscure the most serious terror attack on US soil since 9/11. …

    November 17 2009 / Comments / Read More »

    The Silver Lining of the Left in Power – by Dennis Prager »

    The madness of liberal policies has been laid bare for all to see. …

    November 17 2009 / Comments / Read More »

    Obama’s Bow to “World Opinion” – by Thomas Sowell »

    Trying terrorists in civilian courts is a defeat for the United States not a victory for the rule of law. …

    November 17 2009 / Comments / Read More »

    America on Trial – by Jacob Laksin »

    How a civilian trial of Khaled Sheikh Mohammed could endanger the country. …

    November 16 2009 / Comments / Read More »

    Presumed Guilty – by Peter Collier »

    Why KSM must be licking his chops and praising Allah….

    November 16 2009 / Comments / Read More »

    The Scapegoat Syndrome

    By Paul Greenberg · Saturday, November 14, 2009

    A familiar pattern emerges after every treacherous assault on this country. The surprise attack is dissected not just to learn who wreaked all the havoc, but who was responsible for missing the clues that it was coming. It happened after Pearl Harbor, when Americans wanted to know why it took so long to get the warning to Hawaii, particularly because our people in Washington knew an attack was likely, having broken the Japanese diplomatic code. Why, on that Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, were our aircraft lined up wingtip to wingtip at Hickam Field just waiting to be taken out by Japanese dive-bombers and fighters? It had to be a conspiracy!

    A Silver Lining to Storms of Sorrow

    By Mark Alexander · Thursday, November 12, 2009

    There are many reasons why I look forward to Veterans Day, one being that it affords me the opportunity to write about Patriots who have sacrificially served our nation, honoring their sacred oaths to support and defend our Constitution.

    So, each year at this time, I have the privilege of profiling friends whose conduct and lives are personal inspirations to me.

    More Islamofascism:

    November 17, 2009 Posted by | Islam, Jihad in America, Political Correctness, Politics, propaganda, Real Purpose of Govt., Wake Up, WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

    Islamofascism: Islam is as Islam does

    The barbarians are no longer at the gate. They’re inside the fort, and it’s time for the insanity to stop. This is not Islamophobia, it is Islamo-realism. You invent a jihadi-detector that works every time it’s used, and we’ll welcome you back with open arms.

    Time to get an education and for Washington to get their noses out of their derrierers!  Jihadist action in America and our military is more dangerous than even Washington realizes as they are captive to political correctness regarding Muslim prisoners (e.g. giving them toothbrushes to be turned into shanks, uncuffing them for prayers, etc.). 

    Please read some of the best articles on this subject.  The first is historical data, but worth the initial read.  Continue on and please sear the terrorists’ faces into your memory so that when they are released into the population due to government folly, you can know them well enough to call the vigilantes…

    You say Islamism and I say Islam, you say Islamist and I say Islamic … let’s call the whole thing jihad!

    Islamism or Islam?—Islamist or Islamic? By Dr. Andrew Bostom  (posted by Atlas Shrugs)

    Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan (with his colleague, Iranian President Ahmadinejad): “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it”

     During the autumn of 1843, in the heart of Istanbul, Turkey, Sir Henry Layard [1], the British archeologist, writer, and diplomat, witnessed the punishment mandated by the Shari’a, i.e., Islamic Law for apostasizing from Islam. He described this abhorrent spectacle as follows:

     “An Armenian who had embraced Islamism [emphasis added] had returned to his former faith. For his apostasy he was condemned to death according to the Mohammedan [Islamic] law. His execution took place, accompanied by details of studied insult and indignity directed against Christianity and Europeans in general. The corpse was exposed in one of the most public and frequented places in Stamboul [Istanbul], and the head, which had been severed from the body, was placed upon it, covered by a European hat.”

     Layard’s narrative demonstrates how in mid-19th century parlance, “Islamism” and “Islam” were synonymous, and meant to be equivalent to “Catholicism,” “Protestantism,” and “Judaism”—not to “radical” or “fundamentalist” sects of any of these religions.  Moreover, through at least the mid-1950s, scholars devoted to the formal study of Islamic doctrine and history were still referred to as “Islamists.”

     Turkey’s current Prime Minister Erdogan, commenting in August, 2007 [2] on the term “moderate Islam,” frequently used in the West to describe his ruling political party, the AKP, stated, “These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.” Erdogan’s displeasure is ironic, even somewhat humorous, given the contemporary Western apologetic obsession to recast the terms “Islamism,” and “Islamist,” to denote, exclusively, “radical” or “immoderate” Islam, and its adherents. But the irony of Erdogan’s ire aside, artificial distinctions between “Islamism” and Islam, “Islamist” and Islamic are logically incoherent, obfuscating irrefragable truths about living Islamic dogma, and its modern manifestations.

     The 1990 Cairo Declaration [3], or “Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Islam”—not Islamism—was drafted and ratified by all the Muslim member nations of the Organization of the Islamic—not Islamist—Conference (OIC [4]), a 57 state collective including every Islamic nation on earth. The OIC, currently headed by Turkey’s Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu [4], thus represents the entire Muslim ummah (or global community), and is the largest single voting bloc in the United Nations.

     Its preamble and concluding articles (24 and 25) make plain that the OIC [4]’s Cairo Declaration [3] is designed to supersede Western conceptions of human rights as enunciated, for example, in the US Bill of Rights [5]. The preamble repeats a Koranic injunction affirming Islamic supremacism, (Koran 3:110 [6]): “Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Islamic Ummah which Allah made the best nation…” The gravely negative implications of this  Islamic Law (Shari’a)-based document [3] (“There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Shari’a”) are most apparent in its transparent rejection of freedom of conscience in Article 10 [3], while articles 19 [3] and 22 [3] reiterate Shari’a principles stated throughout the document, which clearly apply to the “punishment”—death—for so-called  “apostates” from Islam.

     The Cairo Declaration [3]—entirely consistent with Islamic Law—also introduces unacceptable discrimination against non-Muslims and women, while sanctioning the legitimacy of dehumanizing, Shari’a-compliant punishments, from flogging, to mutilation, and stoning.

     And polling data from a rigorously conducted survey [7] released April, 2007 demonstrate the Cairo Declaration’s Islamic Law principles—antithetical to Western formulations of human rights—are embraced by the preponderance of the world’s Muslims. Fully 2/3 of a representative sample of 4400 Muslims from Morocco, Egypt, Pakistan, and Indonesia desired the ultimate jihad conquest imperatives: to re-create a unified supra-national Islamic state, or Caliphate, ruled by “strict application of Shari’a.”

     These quintessential goals of jihad were reiterated by the mass murdering jihadist psychiatrist Nidal Hasan as part of an erstwhile “medical grand rounds [8]” given on June 27, 2007. Although Hasan merely reiterates salient aspects of classical jihad theory [9] (i.e., see slides 35, 39, 42, 43, 44, 45,  and 49 [8]), this reality is understandably “shocking” to our willfully uninformed elites in the media, military, and government. Nidal Hasan’s presentation concludes, in full accord with classical Islamic doctrine regarding jihad war, (slide 49 [8]), “Fighting to establish an Islamic State to please Allah, even by force is condoned by (sic) Islam.”

    Unapologetic observations from 1950 by a great 20th century “Islamist” scholar of the Shari’a, G.H. Bousquet [10], contextualize these ominous trends. Bousquet described Islam itself as “as a doubly totalitarian system,” which, “claimed to impose itself on the whole world and it claimed also, by the divinely appointed Muhammadan law…to regulate down to the smallest details the whole life of the Islamic community and of every individual believer.”

    Former NYC prison guard blinded, nearly raped by al-Qaeda inmates warns against plan to try jihadists in city

    Is anyone in D.C. listening, or are they too busy playing politics and putting the supposed symbolism of the trial over the array of obvious security concerns? Louis Pepe Update, and an update on this story. “Blinded Prison Guard: Don’t House Terror Suspects in NYC,” by Joseph Abrams for Fox News, November 16 (thanks to Sam):  [WHY ARE WE TRYING NON-CITIZENS IN OUR COURT???]

    The high-security prison in New York City where 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is expected to be sent to await his trial has a supermax wing to keep even the most notorious criminals quiet — but it isn’t perfect. Just ask Louis Pepe.

    Ten months before Al Qaeda in 2001 struck a deathblow in the heart lower Manhattan, one of the terrorist group’s founding members plunged a sharpened comb through Pepe’s left eye and into his brain, blinding the 42-year-old prison guard and causing severe brain injuries that plague him to this day.

    Pepe told he worries that sending Mohammed and four of his alleged fellow 9/11 conspirators to New York could compromise the safety of the guards at the MCC prison. Keeping the prisoners in one location, he said, was especially dangerous.

    Read more…

    Sedition! O-Liar! Busted! BOMBSHELL Uncovered: Obama said on the senate floor: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is going to get “full military trial with all the bells and whistles” “justice will be carried out in his case” (Atlas)

    In a stunning act of denial and capitulation to Islamic jihad, the Obama administration submits by  bringing the masterminds of the shocking invasion of America into a New York courtroom, to try the Muslim masterminds of the most brutal attack on American soil in modern history — joining “over a millennium of jihad wars, land expropriations, enslavements, and humiliations of the conquered non-Muslim populations on three continents.”Khalid Sheikh Mohammed decapitation of Daniel Pearl

    Daniel pearl

    MObama Urges Congress Not to Probe Fort Hood, Warns Against Turning Tragedy Into “Political Theater”, Obama is aiding and abeting jihad against US (Atlas)

    (Could you imagine GW Bush doing this after 9-11?)

    The latest incomprehensible outrage from the muhammedan president. Whose side is he on? It sure ain’t America’s.

    The President is attempting to halt an investigation into the largest attack on a military base in US history? The first since 911, on Hussein’s watch? Is that not treason? Aiding and abetting the enemy. He warns of “political theater”? Uncovering the facts behind an Islamic attack on our soil is “political theater”. He is political theater. He is the Lawrence Olivier of political theater.

    The Democrats have subjugated themselves to Islam and assumed the role of de facto political party of Islam. Every day multiple gut wrenches in post America. The most devastating angle in all this is how even senior Democratic Members of Congress submit to the Muhammadan president. Islam is a political party and we know now they are the Democrats. Khalid Sheik Mohammad, now this…

    No More Muslims In U.S. Military!

    It became evidently almost immediately that the mass murderer in yesterday’s killing spree at Fort Hood was a Muslim who was motivated by jihadist impulses. Nidal Malik Hasan had told fellow soldiers that the Muslim who killed two recruiters last summer in Little Rock, Arkansas had done the right thing. He spoke openly of his belief that the Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq should rise up and fight the aggressor, by which he meant the U.S. military of which he inexplicably was a part. [Thanks to The American View*]

    By Bryan Fischer
    American Family Association
    Director Of Issues Analysis

    It became evidently almost immediately that the mass murderer in yesterday’s killing spree at Fort Hood was a Muslim who was motivated by jihadist impulses.

    Nidal Malik Hasan had told fellow soldiers that the Muslim who killed two recruiters last summer in Little Rock, Arkansas had done the right thing. He spoke openly of his belief that the Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq should rise up and fight the aggressor, by which he meant the U.S. military of which he inexplicably was a part.

    He wrote blog entries urging jihad, entries which six months ago attracted the attention of the FBI. Bizarrely, its investigation was closed, he was allowed to continue serving in the military, and as a result, 11 innocent soldiers are now dead, cut down in cold blood on one of their own bases on U.S. soil.

    It is time, I suggest, to stop the practice of allowing Muslims to serve in the U.S. military. The reason is simple: the more devout a Muslim is, the more of a threat he is to national security. Devout Muslims, who accept the teachings of the Prophet as divinely inspired, believe it is their duty to kill infidels. Yesterday’s massacre is living proof. And yesterday’s incident is not the first fragging incident involving a Muslim taking out his fellow U.S. soldiers.

    Of course, most U.S. Muslims don’t shoot up their fellow soldiers. Fine. As soon as Muslims give us a foolproof way to identify their jihadis from their moderates, we’ll go back to allowing them to serve. You tell us who the ones are that we have to worry about, prove you’re right, and Muslims can once again serve. Until that day comes, we simply cannot afford the risk. You invent a jihadi-detector that works every time it’s used, and we’ll welcome you back with open arms.

    This is not Islamophobia, it is Islamo-realism.

    And don’t give us reassurances about the oaths that Muslim soldiers take to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Hasan took that oath, and it proved meaningless. In fact, the more devout a Muslim is, the more likely he is to lie to you through his teeth, since lying to the infidel to advance the cause of Islam is commended, not just permitted, in the Koran.

    It’s time we all got over the nonsense that all cultures and religions are equally valid or worthy. They most certainly are not. While Christianity is a religion of peace, founded by the Prince of Peace, Islam is a religion of war and violence, founded by a man who routinely chopped the heads off his enemies, had sex with nine-year old girls, and made his wealth plundering merchant caravans.

    And just as Christians are taught to imitate the life of Christ, so Muslims are taught to imitate the Prophet in all things. Yesterday, Nidal Malik Hasan was simply being a good Muslim.

    The military is not about social engineering or diversity or multiculturalism or about proving what open-minded people we are. It’s about being ready to break things and kill people so that Americans can sleep securely in their beds at night. The mission is too important to be compromised by enlisting possible jihadi warriors and giving them the weapons and training to gun down our own soldiers and paying them all the while.

    The barbarians are no longer at the gate. They’re inside the fort, and it’s time for the insanity to stop.  [emphasis mine]

    * The [previous] article makes many good points. But, we [The American View] do not agree with the “mission” of today’s military including the unGodly, unConstitutional Iraq/Afghanistan wars. We do not support a standing military. We believe that any “military” force we have must be made of Godly men only because God does not bless unGodliness. — J.L.

    Why Is It That Even Accurate Commentary About Islam Seems To Involve A Disclaimer?

    2009 November 14
    by John Nampion

    In what appears to be the latest socially acceptable way to condemn Islamo-Fascism while still appearing to be reasonable and inclusive, many commentators have taken to excoriating Terrorists while still reminding the rest of us that Muslims are “good people” who, when it comes right down to it, are “just like us,” with the same wants, goals, likes and dislikes.

    Bill O’Reilly has been doing it a lot lately: In his November 11th Talking Points Memo he makes a reasonable case for why Nidal Malik Hasan should be called a “…Muslim terrorist, period. He killed out of blind hatred. He is a villain and there is no excuse for his rampage.”

    All well and good.

    But then Mr. O’Reilly takes great pains to make sure we comprehend what his central belief is:

    “We do, however, continue to believe that most Muslims are good people, and I understand they must be protected, but not to a ridiculous degree”.

    May I ask whom they need to be protected from?

    He does the same thing later in the program in his Back Of The Book segment with Fox News Anchor Jane Skinner:

    O’Reilly and Skinner are in total agreement that they disavow Reverend Pat Robertson’s thesis that “Islam is a violent political system bent on the overthrow of the governments of the world.”

    O’Reilly poses the following inquiry to Ms. Skinner:

    “So Jane: Does that do any good for America, or for anybody, slamming Islam like that?”

    “Certainly not”, she replies.

    Even Rich Lowry, in an otherwise excellent post in the National Review Online (The PTSD Evasion) makes the argument that

    “Obviously, Hasan isn’t a representative American Muslim, nor is his act an indictment of Muslims in the military. We can acknowledge both those things without laboring to obscure the nature of his crime in childish evasions.”

    Far be it from me to dispute the efficacy of those types of statements: It’s not like I know a lot of guys down at the local Mosque and hang out with them when their prayers are done for the day.

    But it is awful tough to believe a religion whose stated goal is to destroy or enslave anyone who is a non-believer is capable of putting out a lot of devout followers who want to co-exist peacefully with the rest of us.

    There might be a couple, or even 10 or 20, or for that matter, more than 2,000. I wish them well and salute their bravery.

    But to think that “most” Muslims don’t subscribe to the deadly theology that its Imams and seers and Mullahs advocate is to be, well… a tad naive.

    Don’t you think?

    From Punditarian at the Astute Bloggers:

    Imagine for a moment that there was a political movement that advocated:

    That it must dominate the entire world with its unifying ideology –

    That the entire world must come under the rulership of its single dictator –

    That the United States Constitution and all American laws must be replaced by the laws promulgated by this particular political movement and its leader –

    That it was proper for members of this political party to kill all who did not submit to their rule, and take from them everything they own –

    That women must be eternally subjugated, and deprived of education, the right to work, the right to vote, and the freedom to choose their husbands –

    That representational art, music, dancing, and theatrical performances (including films) must be abolished –

    That banking, mortgages, a free market in securities, and commercial credit all be eliminated –

    That sovereign states which refused to submit to this political movement be destroyed –

    And so on.

    Do you think for a New York minute that adherents of that political philosophy or members of such a political party would be enrolled in the United States Armed Forces? That the United States would encourage political organizers for such a party to have official establishments on American military bases, in American prisons, or on the campuses of government-supported American universities? That the American president would go out of his way to coddle, praise, stroke, and conciliate such a political party?

    But if you call such a political movement a “religion” and say that its tenets were given it by its God, then you’ll be free to infilitrate, subvert, and attack our American way of life, again and again and again.

    There was no madness at Fort Hood. That was just the worldwide jihad in action. [emphasis mine]

    The madness is in Washington.

    It is past time to recognize that whether or not you want to be at war with the jihad, the jihad is at war with you.


    Jihad Watch –

    The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran by Robert Spencer, Director of Jihad Watch

    • The true meaning of celebrated and seemingly benign verses, such as “Strive in the way of Allah” and “Persecution is worse than slaughter”
    • How the Koran sanctions domestic abuse, honor killing, and murder
    • How the Koran not only discourages Infidels from reading it, but mandates that they don’t even touch it
    • Why President Obama is dangerously close to supporting a multiculturalism based on an ideology that aims to destroy the principles America
      holds dear

    The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam by Robert Spencer
    About the Title: Everything (well, almost everything) you know about Islam and the Crusades is wrong because most textbooks and popular history books


    updated link

    are written by left-wing academics and Islamic apologists who justify their contemporary political agendas with contrived historical facts that you won’t be

    taught in school and will never hear on the evening news. He supplies a revealing list of “Book You’re Not Supposed to Read” (as far as the PC left is concerned) and takes you on a fast-paced, politically incorrect tour of Islamic

    teaching and Crusade history that will give you all the information you need to understand the true nature of the global conflict America faces today.

    Islamofascism: Islam is as Islam does:

    November 16, 2009 Posted by | Christian, Culture, Islam, Jihad in America, Leftists Criticize Conservatives, Political Correctness, Politics, propaganda, Real Purpose of Govt., Wake Up, WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

    Two Sets of Justice

    Some pigs are more equal than others…  The story Animal Farm should be required reading for all High Schoolers, and it was at one time, not so long ago.  With the President’s decision to put the fate of the worst terrorists known to the industrialized world in the hands of 12 jurors and the whims and potential technicalities of the American justice system not only in jeopardy, but that’s the point – isn’t it?  Payback to all those Muslim-hating conservatives who get in the way of his NWO plans; payback to all the far-left islamofascists who financed his campaign; payback to the Saudi Prince to whom he bowed and whose ring Obama kissed… 
    Don’t worry, Mr. President, your payback will come next election day!jump from crashing tower

    Here are some of the better thoughts from the bloggers out there in the un-neutralized zone™.

    Friday, November 13, 2009

    Making a mockery of our courts…

    Today Attorney General Eric Holder held a press conference to announce his decision to prosecute five of the 9-11 co-conspirators in our Federal Courts. He also mentioned that others will be prosecuted by a Military Commission. We now have two separate sets of Justice in our country. He explained the different factors that he took into consideration when determining who would be tried by our Department of Justice and who would be tried by the Defense Department. According to him the five being tried by our Justice Department committed crimes involving civilians while those to be tried by our Defense Department committed their crimes against our military. My friends this was an act of WAR and it belongs in the hands of a Military Commission. These animals are going to use this opportunity to spew their hate of this country and make a complete mockery of the entire process. This is outrageous.

    I hate to think that these animals could get off because of some stupid technicality. It happens all the time when our courts are involved. Remember the incompetence of Judge Ito during the OJ Simpson trial? It is frightening. The rules all of a sudden change[d]. I would think that some of the evidence which was gathered through the use of water boarding would not be admissible. These animals have already confessed to these terrorist acts. They wanted to plead guilty last December and were willing to die as martyrs for their religion. The bottom line is that we will pay the price. The only thing that will be on trial will be our country. [emphasis mine] Believe me they can find a leftist Judge out there who hates this country and is willing to put us on trial. Our interrogation techniques will be back on the news and a lot of our Government intelligence will be exposed. The State Run Media will have a feast. They will be putting the lives of those who have defended this country (CIA) in jeopardy. This will turn into a circus and a platform for these low lives to spew their rhetoric. Stay tuned…


    Obama Reduces September 11th Act of War on America to a Law Enforcement Issue (Atlas Shrugs)

    In a stunning act of denial and capitulation to Islamic jihad, the Obama administration submits by bringing the masterminds of the shocking invasion of America into a New York courtroom, to try the Muslim masterminds of the most brutal attack on American soil in modern history — joining “over a millennium of jihad wars, land expropriations, enslavements, and humiliations of the conquered non-Muslim populations on three continents.”

    Imagine, the enemy is facing a civilian trial in NYC. Devastating. How much intel will be compromised when these jihad barbarians are all lawyered up? Those bastards should be tried as war criminals at GITMO – military court.


    Same Old, Same Old at Fort Hood

    By Victor Davis Hanson · Thursday, November 12, 2009

    Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan is accused of murdering last week 13 people (12 of whom were soldiers) and wounding another 30 at Fort Hood, Texas. It was not the first, nor will it be the last, domestic terrorist incident since Sept. 11, 2001. ***See below*** 

    Boehner: 9/11 Show Trial an “Irresponsible Decision”

    Boehner says putting the so-called perps on trial would revert to a “dangerous pre-9/11 mentality – treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue and hoping for the best.” The neocons argue that the Constitution — or for that matter, the Geneva Convention — do not apply to terrorists.

    Mukasey: ‘very high’ risk of attack over NYC 9/11 trial

    Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey said today that it is highly likely that terrorists will attack New York City as a consequence of the Obama administration’s decision to send five alleged Sept. 11 plotters there for trial in federal court.


    The Names of Those Killed at Fort Hood 

    (Patriot Post)
    Our prayers go out to the families, friends and comrades in arms of those killed and wounded at Fort Hood last Thursday. Here are the 14 who died:

    Chief Warrant Officer Michael Grant Cahill, 65, of Cameron, Texas, husband and father of three, had just returned to work as a physician assistant after suffering a heart attack.

    Maj. Libardo Eduardo Caraveo, 52, of Woodbridge, Virginia, was a native of Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. He was preparing to deploy to Afghanistan, and leaves a wife, three sons and two step-daughters.

    Staff Sgt. Justin M. DeCrow, 32, of Evans, Georgia, was helping train new soldiers on how to help new veterans with paperwork. He was a husband and father.

    Capt. John Gaffaney, 56, of San Diego, California, was married with a son. He was a psychiatric nurse and had arrived at Fort Hood the day before the shooting to prepare for deployment to Iraq.

    Spc. Frederick Greene, 29, of Mountain City, Tennessee, was a combat engineer who leaves behind a wife and two daughters.

    Spc. Jason Dean Hunt, 22, of Tipton, Oklahoma, was recently married and had three children. He served a tour in Iraq and had re-enlisted for six more years.

    Sgt. Amy Krueger, 29, of Kiel, Wisconsin, with the Madison-based 467th Medical Detachment, had arrived at Fort Hood on Tuesday and was scheduled to be deployed to Afghanistan in December. She enlisted just after 9/11.

    Pfc. Aaron Thomas Nemelka, 19, of West Jordan, Utah, was an Eagle Scout. He was scheduled to be deployed to Afghanistan in January. His job: to defuse bombs. Nemelka had enlisted in the Army in October 2008.

    Spc. Michael Pearson , 21, of Bolingbrook, Illinois, was a talented musician who joined the Army only a year ago.

    Capt. Russell Seager, 51, of Racine, Wisconsin, was a psychiatrist who joined the Army a few years ago because he wanted to help veterans returning to civilian life. He had gone to Fort Hood for training before deploying to Afghanistan in December. He leaves behind a wife and a son.

    Pvt. Francheska Velez, 21, of Chicago recently had returned from a tour of duty in Iraq and was pursuing a career in the Army. She was in the building where the shooting occurred filling out paperwork due to her pregnancy. Her unborn child was the 14th victim.

    Juanita Warman, 55, of Pittsburgh was a military physician assistant and the daughter and granddaughter of Army veterans. She leaves behind a husband and two daughters.

    Spc. Kham Xiong, 23, of St. Paul, Minnesota, immigrated from Thailand as a child. He graduated from St. Paul’s Community of Peace Academy in 2004 and was a husband and father. He was at Ft. Hood preparing for a January deployment.

    We Will NEVER Forget

    Two Sets of Justice:

    November 14, 2009 Posted by | Jihad in America, Politics, propaganda, Real Purpose of Govt., WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

    Non-MSM News

    Here’s some ‘un-American’ news you won’t find on most of the mainstream media sources.  Open your eyes to what’s really happening out there and tell your friends.  These are just from three sources.

    As a cute aside, I learned today from a group of young girls that they call it the “hiney” flu (replace the 1’s of H1N1 with i’s and you get “hini”)!!


    Swine Flu Vaccine Propaganda In NY Times’ Lessons For 6th Graders

     The New York Times has produced a detailed lesson plan for students in grades 6-12 that pushes the H1N1 flu vaccine and sets about debunking what the editors describe as “myths” surrounding the swine flu shot.

    Doctors Confirm Flu Shot Disabled Woman As Carrey & McCarthy Lend Support

    Doctors have confirmed that a seasonal flu vaccine led to a Virginia woman becoming severely disabled as actors Jim Carrey and Jenny McCarthy offered their support through their Generation Rescue charity, an organization attempting to raise awareness about the link between vaccines and autism.

    Judge temporarily halts mandatory flu shots for health care workers

    A judge has put a temporary stop to mandatory flu vaccinations for health care workers.

    Pennsylvania Drafts 2009 Mandatory Vaccination, Gun Confiscation Law

    States are getting ready for the mandatory vaccination stage of the eugenics program, and Pennsylvania is right on schedule with Pennsylvania House Bill 492, the “Emergency Health Powers Act.”

    Collaborators in the Campus War against Israel and the Jews: Joel Beinin – by Steven Plaut »

    Meet Stanford’s cheerleader of genocidal Middle East terrorists and suicide bombers….

    Obama’s Resolution to Stifle Free Speech on Islam – by Deborah Weiss »

    Our president’s war on the first amendment….

    Wilders Wins – by Jacob Laksin »

    In a victory for free speech, a British tribunal reverses the ban of Dutch anti-Islam campaigner Geert Wilders. …

    Throwing Rifqa to the Wolves – by Jamie Glazov »

    A Florida court puts a teenage girl’s life at risk….

    Wearing Out America’s Warriors – by Ralph Peters »

    Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings & NAMBLA – VIDEO »

    EDITORIAL: Queering our schools – Washington Times »

    NEW!! More than 2,000 British Schoolgirls Have Reactions to the HPV Vaccine
    In Britain, where vaccination against HPV is given to all schoolgirls aged 12 and older, more than 2 thousand girls have experienced adverse reactions including convulsions, fever, paralysis, and even death. 10/16/2009

    Imposing Sharia Law on the West
    Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali, the 106th Bishop of Rochester, has been outspoken on the threat of extremist Islam, its growth in Britain, and its threat to Christian and religious minorities in Islamic nations.

    Obama adviser: Sharia is just misunderstood
    Daily Mail

    ‘Hate Crime’ Laws Threaten Religious Freedom
    Bringing ‘Thought Crime’ to America

    High-Tech ‘Birth Control’: Health Care or Health Risk?
    Women need to know what birth control chemicals and devices do and what risks they present.

    <!– The Truth Behind the HPV Vaccine and Why Mandating It Violates Your Parental Rights

    –>The Morning-After Pill
    A pill that would make abortions rare? Think again.

    Born or Bred?
    Science Does Not Support the Claim That Homosexuality Is Genetic

    Homosexual activists love to insist that

    October 16, 2009 Posted by | 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Agenda of the Left, Christian, Constituional Issues, Culture, Govt Oppression, Islam, Jihad in America, MSM Disinterest, Political Correctness, propaganda, Wake Up, WordPress Political Blogs | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment